Skip to content
PureTechLab

Might Other States Pursue Australia's in Restricting Social Media for Youth Under Sixteen?

Australia's decisive move to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Politicians, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring intently to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are considering parallel bans.

  • Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader stating that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". A law may be passed next year.
  • Norway is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
  • Ireland is working on a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban remains "a potential tools in reserve".
  • In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked parliament to enact a bill raising the access age for using social media to 16.
  • In France, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
  • The government in the Netherlands has recommended parents to restrict their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding resolution calling for a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is provided. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these services, the step does not create binding law.

"An effective age limit is a good starting point," stated one European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "no option is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in strong data".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government vowed to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. An organization established by the loved ones of a teenager who died after encountering harmful social media material suggests that a strict age ban might not protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to build tools that are secure and age appropriate for minors," stated a leading child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

Across America, legislation is mostly occurring at the regional level amid federal stalemate.

  • Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
  • Florida has enacted a measure banning under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
  • The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation capping teenagers to one hour of social media time per day, with any further access dependent on parental permission.
  • Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed bills mandating adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from various individuals to copy Australia's example, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Beyond these regions, further states are likewise exploring options.

  • The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
  • Brazil has increased the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, global organizations strike a more cautious tone. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "could backfire". The agency points out that the internet can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

Even as this global debate evolves, the steps of this nation and its followers show that policymakers globally are no longer willing to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.

By

Anne Quinn

Tech enthusiast and writer passionate about AI and digital transformation, sharing insights to inspire innovation.

PureTechLab

Type to search articles.